The 5 key takeaways from the landmark climate change assessment
The chapter outlines how the world can limit global heating to under 1.5 C as outlined in the 2015 Paris Agreement The worlds leading authority on climate science published Monday an assessment of how the world can reduce the rate of climate change. It outlines how we can limit global heating to under 1.5 C as outlined in the 2015 Paris Agreement. More than 270 authors from 65 countries wrote the assessment which is the third chapter of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. The first chapter looked at the causes of climate change, the second at the impacts and the third at how we can limit it. Here The Independent has pulled out 5 of the key takeaways from the latest chapter. Greenhouse gas emissions will have to start declining by 2025 to limit warming to 1.5C In the scenarios assessed by the authors of the report, limiting warming by around 1.5C requires global greenhouse gas emissions to start declining by 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43 per cent by 2030. At the same time, methane would also need to be reduced by about a third. Nevertheless, even if this is done the authors said it was almost inevitable that the world will temporarily exceed 1.5C but could return to below it by the end of the century. Its now or never, if we want to limit global warming to 1.5C, said IPCC Working Group III Co -Chair Jim Skea. Without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, it will be impossible. Even limiting warming to around 2C still requires global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by a quarter by 2030. Without a strengthening of policies beyond those that were implemented by the end of 2020, the report says greenhouse gas emissions are projected to rise beyond 2025, leading to a median global warming of 3.2C by 2100. Finance is 3-6 times lower than the amount needed by 2030 to keep warming below 2C The report finds that finance is three to six times lower than the amount needed by 2030 to limit warming to below 2C. The report finds that there is sufficient global capital and liquidity to close investment gaps. However, it says that if this money is to be directed, it will require clear signalling from governments and the international community. Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video Sign up now for a 30-day free trial Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video Sign up now for a 30-day free trial The report says that reduction options costing $100 per tonne of greenhouse gases could reduce global emissions by at least half the 2019 level by 2030. The global economic benefit of limiting warming to 2C will likely exceed the cost of reducing and removing gases The report says that the global economic benefit of limiting warming to 2C, exceeds the cost of reducing emissions and removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere in most scenarios. The economic benefits of avoiding damages from climate change, and of reducing adaptation costs, increase with the stringency of efforts to reduce and remove greenhouse gas emissions, it says. Cost of solar dropped 85% from 2010-2019 The cost of low-emission technologies such as wind, solar and batteries has dropped significantly since 2010 and there has been a large increase in their deployment. From 2010-2019, the cost of solar energy decreased by 85 per cent, wind energy by 55 per cent and lithium ion batteries by 85 per cent, according to the report. Over the same period, solar units were deployed over ten times more and electric vehicles over 100 times more, although this varied across regions. The policy tools used to reduce costs and spur on use include public research and development, funding for pilot projects and subsidies. Changes in our lifestyles and behaviour can result in a 40 to 70% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 The report says that choice architecture can help people adopt low greenhouse gas emission options such as sustainable, healthy diets, shifts to walking and cycling and sustainable consumption of repairable products. The evidence also shows that these lifestyle changes can improve our health and well being, the report says. Individuals with high socio-economic status contribute disproportionately to emissions and have the highest potential for emissions reductions, as citizens, investors, consumers, role models, and professionals, the report adds. Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies AP/Reuters Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Log in New to The Independent? Or if you would prefer: Want an ad-free experience? Hi {{indy.fullName}}