This Pilates Business Loves (and Hates) Tech
Small businesses are always asking: Is the tech they now rely on helping or hurting them? Lisa Serradilla loved taking her Pilates classes virtual over Zoom. But the same technology forces that let her stay in business during the pandemic also burdened her with more costs and complexity. Serradillas experience is a window into the complicated ways our increasingly digital lives are affecting business owners large and (especially) small. Technology is creating more opportunities for them, but its also making it tougher to make money and keep people loyal. Three months ago, Serradilla was forced to close Pilatium, her Pilates studio in New York City, because of the coronavirus. She was surprised that all it took to go virtual was a low-cost subscription to Zoom and a tweak to her website to let people pay for online video sessions. But shes also feeling even more besieged now by various digital services and their never-ending fees. Credit card companies and online payment providers . She has a custom-made website, but many other fitness studios fork over monthly fees for software like Mindbody that let people book classes online. Serradilla said shes feeding technology providers at every turn from fees for digital cash registers to a $1.50 monthly Mastercard association fee. It doesnt seem like a big deal, but you just start to look at how expensive it starts to be in little dribs and drabs, Serradilla said. Running a small business was never easy, and Serradilla got in touch recently to recommend we look at the emerging burdens that technology brings for businesses like hers. I took her up on the suggestion. Serradilla was most irked about ClassPass, a membership program for which people pay to drop in on fitness classes of all sorts. This is exactly the kind of that I wrote about earlier this week. A ClassPass spokesperson said the company helps businesses fill unsold class spots. Serradilla and said that its more complicated. For an in-person class, ClassPass would typically pay her $12 to perhaps $20 while a regular Pilates client might pay $30. Shes glad when ClassPass fills empty spots, but its not easy to control the number of slots going to ClassPass members. She acknowledges that ClassPass might be more useful for other gyms that rely less on regular clients than she does. Serradilla, who worked in the tech industry for years, knows theres no turning back on our increasingly online personal and commercial activity. The existential question for her and other businesses is whether the technology they rely on is helping or hurting them. And the answer is both. Ive been watching the by advertisers with an eyebrow raised in doubt. Companies including , , and others have said they would (temporarily) stop paying for messages on Facebook and Facebook-owned Instagram to force the company to do more about dangerous or hateful content that flourishes there. A boycott is an easy way to score points against a company that is not popular right now. Those advertisers will be back spending on Facebook, most likely. But a similar experience several years ago with YouTube showed that pressure from the companies that pay internet giants bills can force meaningful change. In 2017, news organizations regularly about violent, racist and creepy YouTube videos running with automatically generated advertisements from some of the worlds biggest companies. Stung by their unwitting support of harmful videos, companies including Procter & Gamble and AT&T . And Google, which owns YouTube, responded. The company developed technology to automatically and block advertising on them. Google hired more people to weed out videos that broke its rules. It turned off ads entirely for smaller video makers to reduce financial motivations to post outrageous things. The changes didnt wipe YouTube free of conspiracies and dangerous ideas. But the high profile revolt from some advertisers pushed protection measures that made YouTube a little less horrible for all of us. I would bet Facebook will be forced to change, too, although it doesnt sound that way at the moment. In an email to advertisers The Wall Street Journal, a Facebook executive said the company wouldnt make policy changes because of financial pressure. We set our policies based on principles rather than business interests, she wrote. This is your reminder that advertisements generate 98 percent of Facebooks yearly sales. Companies definitely do make policy changes because of revenue pressure. YouTube proved it. , a contributing Opinion writer for The New York Times, said the investing app Robinhood must build in . Recently, a young man took his own life after he appeared to believe he lost hundreds of thousands of dollars from complex financial transactions in the app. Jingles about cheese. Pitches for a clever pointing device called a mouse. Captain Kirk describing the wonder computer of the 1980s. Vintage TV commercials spliced and compiled into YouTube videos , Eve Peyser writes for The Times. I yesterday that Amazons projects to tackle climate change might be a way to avoid looking at how the company has changed our shopping behavior in an environmentally destructive way. May I present: a new sports stadium in Seattle named after Amazons blueprint to reduce its carbon emissions. Job done. Im so sorry, but extolling an is exactly my jam. (Warning: The lyrics include some words that arent safe for kids ears.) writes the On Tech newsletter, a guide to how technology is reshaping our lives and world.