Only one-in-a-million chance global warming is not manmade, scientists say | The Independent
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences. Last fours years have been hottest since records began in 19th century Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a gold standard level of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to limit rising temperatures, scientists said. Humanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals, the US-led team wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite measurements of rising temperatures over the past 40 years . They said that confidence human activities were raising the heat at the Earth's surface had reached a five-sigma level. This statistical measure meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would appear if there was no warming. Such a gold standard was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm the discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building block of the universe. Benjamin Santer, lead author of the study at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the findings would win over sceptics and spur action. The narrative out there that scientists don't know the cause of climate change is wrong, he said. We do. Mainstream scientists say the burning of fossil fuels is causing more floods, droughts, heat waves and rising sea levels. Donald Trump has often cast doubt on global warming and plans to pull out of the 197-nation Paris climate agreement which seeks to end the fossil fuel era this century by shifting to cleaner energies such as wind and solar power. Sixty-two per cent of Americans polled in 2018 believed that climate change has a human cause, up from 47 per cent in 2013, according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. The findings, by researchers in the US, Canada and Scotland, said evidence for global warming reached the five sigma level by 2005 in two of three sets of satellite data widely used by researchers, and in 2016 in the third. Professor John Christy, of the University of Alabama in Huntsville which runs the third set of data, said there were still many gaps in understanding climate change. His data show a slower pace of warming than the other two sets. You may see a certain fingerprint that indicates human influence, but that the actual intensity of the influence is minor (as our satellite data indicate), he said. Separately in 2013, the United Nations ' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) concluded that it is extremely likely, or at least 95 per cent probable, that human activities have been the main cause of climate change since the 1950s. Peter Stott of the British Met Office, who was among the scientists drawing that conclusion and was not involved in Monday's study, said he would favour raising the probability one notch to virtually certain, or 99-100 per cent. The alternative explanation of natural factors dominating has got even less likely, he said. The last four years have been the hottest since records began in the 19th century. The IPCC will next publish a formal assessment of the probabilities in 2021. I would be reluctant to raise to 99-100 per cent, but there is no doubt there is more evidence of change in the global signals over a wider suite of ocean indices and atmospheric indices, said Professor Nathan Bindoff, a climate scientist at the University of Tasmania. Reuters Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies