Productivity Commission: Councils need Govt help on climate change
Councils' calls for Government help to meet a potential $14b climate change threat have been backed by the Productivity Commission. Photo / File Councils' calls for Government help to meet a potential $14b climate change threat have been backed by the Productivity Commission. Just as a major OECD paper did this year, today's draft report singled out climate change as an increasing cost to councils, as well as a legal conundrum. The commission suggested the Government should widen the NZ Transport Agency's co-funding role to help councils facing climate-related risks, such as sea level rise damaging infrastructure. It also recommended a new agency and resilience fund that could work with councils to overhaul or even relocate vulnerable wastewater and stormwater systems. "To help local government prepare for the impacts of climate change, central government should take the lead on providing high-quality and consistent science and data, standard setting, and legal and decision-making guidance," the commission said. "Institutional and legislative frameworks also need to move from their current focus on recovery after an event towards reducing risk before an event." Professor Ilan Noy, Victoria University's chair in the Economics of Disasters, said councils weren't often able to deal with climate problems, because they often lacked knowledge and resources, or appeared to find it more difficult to deal with local interests. "Central government needs to be involved much more heavily than it currently is in both providing resources and guidance to local government, and in sometimes assisting it in making difficult choices." The recommendations have been welcomed by councils' lobby Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ), which has already called on Wellington for a new national adaptation fund and risk agency. Its president, Dave Cull, said councils relied on long-term planning, so any extra funding would provide certainty around meeting climate change adaptation. The draft report was also applauded by a leading expert in the space, Dr Judy Lawrence of Victoria University's Climate Change Research Institute. Lawrence noted its call to align legal frameworks so councils could have more backing when making planning decisions that addressed climate risks. Another expert, Otago University's Professor Lisa Ellis, said that every day that passed without clarity on climate change adaptation policy brought new losses. "We are investing in risky coastal development without knowing who will protect those investments or how they will be protected; we are making decisions about existing assets without knowing our real options; in the face of increasingly frequent and extreme natural hazards, we are hoping rather than planning for the future," she said. "The Productivity Commission rightly puts helping councils adapt to climate change at the top of its list of urgent actions." An earlier LGNZ report showed that $2.7 billion of roading, water and building infrastructure was at risk from as little half a metre rise in sea level. The value of at risk infrastructure ramped up sharply at each increment of sea level rise, with the data showing that $5.1b worth was at risk at 1 metre of sea level rise, with $7.1b at risk at 1.5m and $14.1b at risk at 3m. Under present projections, the sea level around New Zealand is expected to rise between 30cm and 100cm this century. The incidents are being investigated and firefighters may face disciplinary action.